On 11/20/2013 9:44 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
I think explaining decisions which might not be obvious to a person who
was not around when the decision was made is a good thing.
Why isn't the IETF mailing list archive discussion about the status
change sufficient as an archival record?
To be consistent, are we also going to need to publish an RFC that
explains why an RFC should be promoted to full standard? It's good to
explain that decision too, isn't it?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net