Re: https at ietf.org

On 2013-11-25, at 07:08, Eric Burger <eburger(_at_)standardstrack(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

> I like where this has ended up. I am pretty convinced that HTTPS is mostly a 
> dead end because of the CA problem.
Isn't this at least part of the motivation behind DANE?

(I realise DANE requires moving parts in the client and signatures in the 
published zone, but it seems odd that it hasn't been mentioned.)


Joe

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail