It seems to me that if there are sane strongly-held objections to both of
the alternatives on the table, then neither alternative is suitable for a
standards-track RFC.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Melinda Shore
<melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>wrote:
On 11/28/13 2:29 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
More to the point, if the WG cannot come to IETF consensus, that
itself is sufficient to let the IESG know the WG (a bunch of close
experts) is not *READY* to select a single codec. If the WG is not
*READY* to pick a single codec, neither is the IETF.
This strikes me as precisely the issue. If there's no
consensus there's no consensus.
Melinda