ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-04.txt> (Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element) to Informational RFC

2013-12-04 15:00:40
Works for me.

Thanks

Michael

________________________________________
Von: Brian Trammell [trammell(_at_)tik(_dot_)ee(_dot_)ethz(_dot_)ch]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2013 19:58
An: Scharf, Michael (Michael)
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Betreff: Re: Last Call: <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-04.txt> 
(Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element) to     Informational 
RFC

hi Michael,

Thanks for the comment, and apologies for the delayed reply; I've
replaced this wording in an upcoming -05 revision with:

      Each of the three bits (0x800, 0x400, and 0x200) which are
      reserved for future use in [RFC0793] SHOULD be exported as
      observed in the TCP headers of the packets of this Flow.

Cheers,

Brian

Scharf, Michael (Michael) wrote:
Hi all,

A small editorial nit: RFC 793, RFC3168 and RFC3540 (which is experimental, 
BTW) all classify bits 3,4,5 in octets 13 and 14 of the TCP header as 
"Reserved".

In the information element according to this draft, the corresponding bits 
are named "Future Use", with the reference "per the definition of the bits in 
the TCP header [RFC0793]". Strictly speaking, this terminology differs 
slightly to RFC 793 and the very well-known figure depicting the TCP header.

For whatever it is worth, I suggest to better explain the different wording. 
For instance, instead of ...

      Each of the three future use bits (0x800, 0x400, and 0x200) should
      be exported as observed in the TCP headers of the packets of this
      Flow, as they may be used subsequent to a future update of
      [RFC0793].

... an alternative wording better reflecting the exact header definition in 
RFC 793 could be:

      Each of the three future use bits (0x800, 0x400, and 0x200) should
      be exported as observed in the TCP headers of the packets of this
      Flow, which are reserved for future use in [RFC0793].

Best regards

Michael


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-announce-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-announce-
bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:13 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-
04.txt> (Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element) to
Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
consider
the following document:
- 'Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element'
  <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-04.txt> as
Informational
RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-11-04. Exceptionally, 
comments may
be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document revises the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element
as
   originally defined in [RFC5102] to reflect changes to the TCP Flags
   header field since [RFC0793].




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-
revision/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-
revision/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>