+1. Perens' response is well worth reading.
Universal encryption is not a a laudable goal.
(I'm also struck by the thought that Farrell's draft carefully defines
'attack', yet does not define 'defend'. To defend or not is a choice; that
choice is neglected.)
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Perens
[bruce(_at_)perens(_dot_)com]
Sent: 04 December 2013 01:25
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; perpass(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ietf-http-wg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
I have written a reply to draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00
Please read it at
http://perens.com/works/ietf/perpass/appropriate-response/01.pdf
The reply is _not_ in the form of an Internet Draft, because it's political
discourse.
Thanks
Bruce Perens