Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

ietf

2013-12-04 15:28:32

On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:17 PM, <l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> 
<l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:

Universal encryption is not a a laudable goal.


Unsupported assertions are not helpful.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, Bruce Perens Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, Martin Millnert RE: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, JOSEFSSON Erik RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, l.wood Re: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, Ted Lemon <=

Previous by Date:	RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, l.wood
Next by Date:	Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, l.wood
Previous by Thread:	RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01, l.wood
Next by Thread:	Re: Last Call: <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-04.txt> (Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element) to Informational RFC, Brian Trammell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]