The shepherd writeup for this document (current version at
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg/shepherdwriteup/>)
is not accurate, and that has a major effect on the IETF Last call. For
question 9, it says:
==========
(9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the
strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the
WG as a whole understand and agree with it?
the document represents strong consensus
==========
A hum was taken at IETF 87 for the WG to pick between this proposal and
another; there were many hums in the room for each, with more for this
proposal. That hum was not taken to the WG mailing list. Since then, many
people have given strong reasons to prefer the other proposal for technical
reasons.
--Paul Hoffman