On 01/06/2014 08:51 PM, John Curran wrote:
What happens when the IETF makes a decision that particular "public policy"
requirements
are _to be considered_ (perpass), or specifically _not to be considered_ (RFC
2804) in protocol
development?
I think that's a mis-characterisation. IMO both of those are cases
where there are sound technical reasons for the IETF to do, or not
do, work. Yes, those have impacts, but the public policy angle (if
that's the right term) is a side-effect and is not the reason for
the decision.
S.