Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPL

On Friday, January 10, 2014 08:24:02 PM Gregory Mirsky 
wrote:

> Hi Lars,
> I think that " The whole point of running MPLS is to
> create networks in which paths are provisionable, so
> this is usually not an issue." is only partially
> correct. LDP-based MPLS network is not provisionable and
> LSPs follow IP best route selection. Explicit signaling
> of LSP is achievable in (G)MPLS by using RSVP(-TE)
> signaling.
Greg, I think we can delineate provisioning from whether it 
is dynamic or explicit.

MPLS LSP's are all pre-provisioned, because of the FEC's 
created. Whether those FEC's are dynamically or explicitly 
provisioned is a separate issue.

Mark.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.