The draft ignores the IETF MANETs and IETF LLNs and their IETF
protocols, why is that? IMHO, this document should consider all
related protocols used/standarded in IETF. This informational draft
has missing related information (not much related references, only its
WG references) which confuses especially when IETF publishes it,
because it does not consider all IETF distributed protocols, or does
not explain why.
AB
On 2/3/14, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Distributed Mobility Management
WG (dmm) to consider the following document:
- 'Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management'
<draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-13.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2014-02-17. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines the requirements for Distributed Mobility
Management (DMM) at the network layer. The hierarchical structure in
traditional wireless networks has led primarily to centralized
deployment models. As some wireless networks are evolving away from
the hierarchical structure, a distributed model for mobility
management can be useful to them.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-requirements/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-requirements/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.