Implementers do not do anything with a CPS pointer in a policy qualifier. So,
this addition will not impact interoperability. That said, I understand that
some people want this notice in the certificate, and I see no reason to prevent
this document form moving forward.
Russ
On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:16 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG
(sidr) to consider the following document:
- 'Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates'
<draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2014-02-25. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document updates RFC 6487 by clarifying the inclusion of policy
qualifiers in the certificate policies extension of RPKI resource
certificates.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.