ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Saying no

2014-03-27 18:46:36
On 3/27/14, 4:41 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:34:22PM -0400, John Leslie wrote:

   The sad truth is, the IESG no longer has the spare cycles to "Just
say No."

responsible AD here.

I take the IETF LC input with the gravitas that's appropriate. the IESG
review occurs after the LC.

I was on the receiving end of an IESG that simply stalled a document
until the WG changed its approach, because of IETF concerns, so I
disagree with that claim.  But if it is true, then we might as well
give up.  If there's weak IETF consensus (with some strong objections)
to a document that comes from a WG and has strong consensus inside the
WG, the _only_ people who can say no are the IESG; and they must.

Best regards,

A



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>