ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

2014-04-24 19:51:50
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, April 25, 2014 02:26:22 Martin Rex wrote:

The DMARC policy scheme is actually censoring of a telecommunication
between a messge sender and a message receiver through a telecommunications
provider by some _outside_ third party.  So in the US a p=reject DMARC
policy might potentially be freedom of speech (1st Amendment) violation.

No idea about the rest of it, but this is nonsense.  The 1st Amendment to the 
constitution is a restriction on government action, not on private action.  
See http://xkcd.com/1357/ .

OK.  I'm terribly sorry for you across the pond then.

In the German constitution and in the European Human Rights Convention
this is a basic right, and it protects not just from your own government,
but also from private actors and other governments.

-Martin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>