Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, April 25, 2014 02:26:22 Martin Rex wrote:
The DMARC policy scheme is actually censoring of a telecommunication
between a messge sender and a message receiver through a telecommunications
provider by some _outside_ third party. So in the US a p=reject DMARC
policy might potentially be freedom of speech (1st Amendment) violation.
No idea about the rest of it, but this is nonsense. The 1st Amendment to the
constitution is a restriction on government action, not on private action.
See http://xkcd.com/1357/ .
OK. I'm terribly sorry for you across the pond then.
In the German constitution and in the European Human Rights Convention
this is a basic right, and it protects not just from your own government,
but also from private actors and other governments.
-Martin