Subject: Re: Media type for PGP message? Date: Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:37:36AM
-0700 Quoting ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com
(ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com):
So why not work towards the use of RFC 3156 signatures instead? Especially
if your goal is to make this stuff more user-friendly.
I support this -- 3156, for all its warts, alleged or true, is implemented
in a few MUAs and works. FSVO works, but nothing else comes even close
today.
Mutt, my MUA, had a hell of grokking the first post; because the data
between the PGP markers was quite far from parseable as cryptotext. It
does that dreaded scanning, compared to which 3156 is elegant.
Regards,
--
Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Now I'm concentrating on a specific tank battle toward the end of World War II!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature