I’m actually a little out of touch with the drill on a media-type
registration daft. Does it need a WG?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> wrote:
t.p. <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I realise that the Applications Area is redundant and will soon be
> exterminated, but, perhaps, it just might linger on long enough to
> provide a home for a discussion of a new media type:-); the
> apps-discuss list could just do.
Tom, that's exactly the opposite of what the IESG said.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software
Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
--
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)