ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

2014-10-23 12:56:31
Juan,

Remember,  we are not just discussing space applications. We are discussing 
general applications hundreds of millions of nodes.
Bundling may work well for your application in space with four or five nodes, 
but perhaps not so much for general Internet.  Remember IETF is INTERNET 
Engineering Task Force.  CCSDS is Space.  If IETF is going to work on 
something, it needs to address the general needs of the Internet user base, not 
just Space.  That is CCSDS' realm.

Will


A good overview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zOLrQJ5kbU

Some papers are here with link to  presentations.
http://named-data.net/publications/


But above is just one viewpoint of ICN.  ICNRG should lead you to others.
https://irtf.org/icnrg


A publish/subscribe architecture is what BBN came up with for F6 (Fractionated 
Spacecraft)
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2348616.2348626


Will
******************************
William D. Ivancic
Phone 216-433-3494
Mobile 440-503-4892
http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~ivancic


From: "Juan A. Fraire" 
<juanfraire(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:juanfraire(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:10 AM
To: William Ivancic 
<ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com<mailto:ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com>>
Cc: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>, Kevin Fall 
<kfall(_at_)kfall(_dot_)net<mailto:kfall(_at_)kfall(_dot_)net>>, Martin 
Stiemerling 
<mls(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:mls(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>,
 "iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org<mailto:iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org>" 
<iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org<mailto:iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org>>, 
"iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>, Lloyd Wood 
<lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk<mailto:lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>>,
 "dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Subject: Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

Hi Will,

Where can I read (not slides) about how ICN handles routing, forwarding, 
buffering, network-level congestion, and contact predictability? Is there an 
RFC or good article about these?

Thanks,


J.Fraire
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina


On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:47 AM, William Ivancic 
<ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com<mailto:ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com>>
 wrote:
Hi Kevin,

Yes, I worked closely with this group.  Chart 19 says it all. Buy the way, 
don't confuse the need for DTN with the need for the Bundle protocol.  Chart 19 
supports Wes' comments.  There is not way this group can deploy large networks 
without item 2.

Challenging network environment leads to link and network disruptions

  1.  Need to develop a robust DTN based transport service
  2.  Requires solutions to addressing, routing, management, discovery and 
forwarding/QOS

I have not seen this group actively participating on any of the DTN mail list 
in the past year or two or perhaps more.  Time flies.

Will


________________________________
From: Kevin Fall <kfall(_at_)kfall(_dot_)net<mailto:kfall(_at_)kfall(_dot_)net>>
To: William Ivancic 
<ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com<mailto:ivancic(_at_)syzygyengineering(_dot_)com>>
Cc: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>; Martin Stiemerling 
<mls(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:mls(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>;
 "iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org<mailto:iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org>" 
<iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org<mailto:iab(_at_)iab(_dot_)org>>; 
"iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>; Lloyd Wood 
<lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk<mailto:lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>>;
 "dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>" 
<dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

Based on a meeting I recently attended and 2014 references such as this:

(http://nsrc.cse.psu.edu/talks_2014/thoughts_on_future_army_waveforms_20Mar2014.pdf)

I cannot share your conclusion.



_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:dtn(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn