Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

On Dec 26, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks(_at_)nostrum(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
> Why did you settle on a proposed name for the combined upper-layers area that 
> implies it will be sleeping?
Napt is past tense.   It foreshadows a refreshing awakening, not sleep.

> I would think it would make getting ADs even harder to be asking companies to 
> sponsor an AD of napping.
We could choose a different name.   How about Transport, Applications and 
Realtime (TAR)?