Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Robert Sparks <rjsparks(_at_)nostrum(_dot_)com> wrote:
    > Why did you settle on a proposed name for the combined upper-layers
    > area that implies it will be sleeping?

Good question.
I figured "NetAPP" was taken :-)

Here is perhaps the worst alternative I can think of:
    Networked Applications and Transport (NAT).

and yet...

I too would like a more inspired name.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature