Stephen Farrell wrote:
I've looked back at the IETF LC for this and chatted with the
TLS chairs and my conclusion is that we did end up with rough
consensus for this so I've put it on the Feb 19 IESG telechat.
I think Sean's shepherd writeup [1] did a fine job of capturing
the LC outcome there so I won't try better that.
Has the IESG given up on "technical leadership", and into rubberstamping?
Improving the downgrade-scsv proposal to make it suck *MUCH* less
would be trivial, and this would be a prime candidate for the IESG
to bounce the current proposal back to the WG and ask them to FIX IT
or be gone.
-Martin