On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot(_at_)mnot(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Cool! Some quick feedback:
* you should explicitly accommodate target attributes (i.e., extension
fields)
* 'rev' was only included in 5988 for backwards compatibility with some
fairly esoteric use cases; don't think it's necessary or good here.
* you need to specify how to determine the context of the link (using
RFC5988 terminology).
Thanks Mark. Excellent feedback!
-andy