On 3/3/15 18:09 , Stuart Cheshire wrote:
On 5 Jan, 2015, at 03:44, Markus Stenberg
<markus(_dot_)stenberg(_at_)iki(_dot_)fi> wrote:
- REQ5: I am not sure what ‘integrate’ means here. Unidirectional access (SSD ->
DNS-SD/mDNS? SSD <- DNS-SD/mDNS?)? Bidirectional?
Is this better?
REQ5: SSD should leverage and build upon with current link scope
DNS-SD/mDNS protocols and deployments.
Stuart Cheshire
The original wording at least implied some level of interoperability,
I'm not sure "leverage and build upon" does that. It sound more like
code reuse is important rather than interoperability.
REQ5: SSD should inter-operate with current link scope
DNS-SD/mDNS protocols and deployments to the extent
practicable.
I think my answer to the question is bidirectional would be the best
case. But, remember these are competing requirements to be balanced.
So, in the worst case ships-in-the-night meets REQ5 and REQ6.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: farmer(_at_)umn(_dot_)edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================