IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2015
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Nico Williams, 10:58
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:48
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:38
- Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Rob Stradling, 10:32
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Richard Shockey, 10:18
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:12
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Leif Johansson, 07:10
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Matthew Ford, 07:08
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Andrew Sullivan, 06:43
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Christian de Larrinaga, 06:42
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Fred Baker (fred), 02:11
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Fred Baker (fred), 02:11
March 30, 2015
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Richard Shockey, 23:09
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Richard Shockey, 22:41
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Brian E Carpenter, 21:45
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Dave Crocker, 21:07
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB/ISOC Workshop on Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale, Kathleen Moriarty, 19:17
- Re: Thoughts from IETF-92, Richard Shockey, 18:16
- Thoughts from IETF-92, IETF Chair, 15:40
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Nico Williams, 15:06
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Stephen Farrell, 14:50
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Melinda Shore, 14:45
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Nico Williams, 14:29
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Sean Turner, 13:44
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE, 11:24
March 28, 2015
- Fwd: Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Stephen Farrell, 17:51
- ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Stephen Farrell, 17:38
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:08
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Viktor Dukhovni, 16:19
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Massimiliano Pala, 11:05
- Re: Generalist ADs?, joel jaeggli, 11:02
- Re: Generalist ADs?, Keith Moore, 10:41
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Keith Moore, 10:33
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Leif Johansson, 10:13
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:49
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Keith Moore, 09:20
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Stephen Farrell, 09:18
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Thomas D. Nadeau, 08:54
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Massimiliano Pala, 08:47
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Dave Cridland, 03:43
- Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 00:43
March 27, 2015
- Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents, Massimiliano Pala, 23:51
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 23:14
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, l.wood, 20:27
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:43
- IETF 93 - Registration is Now Open!, IETF Secretariat, 15:02
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Larry Masinter, 10:54
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Dave Cridland, 07:37
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, t.p., 06:56
March 26, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 22:43
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Kathleen Moriarty, 18:16
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 18:14
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Black, David, 18:04
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Dave Cridland, 17:10
- Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal), Mary Barnes, 17:09
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Fred Baker (fred), 16:53
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Fred Baker (fred), 16:38
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Michael Richardson, 15:52
- Re: Generalist ADs?, Abdussalam Baryun, 15:04
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Alia Atlas, 14:49
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet, 14:41
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:37
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Lee Howard, 14:23
- DNSSEC change on IETF web pages, IETF Chair, 14:22
- Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Michael Richardson, 13:42
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:24
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Ted Lemon, 13:12
- RE: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Black, David, 12:52
- RE: Generalist ADs?, Black, David, 12:39
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, t.p., 12:12
- Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Melinda Shore, 11:36
- We should drop the useless urn: prefix, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:33
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Ted Lemon, 11:30
- Generalist ADs?, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 11:24
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Ted Lemon, 11:22
- "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 11:21
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Bob Hinden, 11:07
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:58
- Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal), Dave Crocker, 10:52
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Kathleen Moriarty, 10:16
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Michael Richardson, 10:12
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Michael Richardson, 10:11
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 09:53
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Mary Barnes, 09:41
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Andrew Sullivan, 09:33
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, George Michaelson, 09:32
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Randy Bush, 09:31
- RE: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Michael StJohns, 09:28
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Terry Manderson, 09:18
- RE: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Adrian Farrel, 09:10
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Ted Lemon, 08:25
- Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal, Dave Crocker, 07:41
March 23, 2015
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Nico Williams, 21:53
- Re: Proposed text for draft-farrresnickel-harassment-06, Sam Hartman, 21:16
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Sam Hartman, 20:45
- Proposed text for draft-farrresnickel-harassment-06, Nico Williams, 14:22
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Jari Arkko, 14:17
- IETF 92 - Dining Options, IETF Secretariat, 10:52
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:46
- RE: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Adrian Farrel, 10:40
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Sam Hartman, 10:16
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:15
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-09, Peter Yee, 09:03
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dan Harkins, 08:57
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dave Crocker, 07:11
- Re: review of I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Larry Masinter, 02:58
- review of I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Larry Masinter, 02:50
March 22, 2015
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Alia Atlas, 23:13
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Brian E Carpenter, 20:56
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dan Harkins, 19:20
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dan Harkins, 16:57
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Randy Bush, 16:47
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Alia Atlas, 16:31
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Randy Bush, 16:23
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dave Crocker, 15:58
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dan Harkins, 15:53
- Re: Proposed IETF Websites Privacy Policy; Community Input Requested, S Moonesamy, 15:17
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Allison Mankin, 15:14
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Melinda Shore, 14:32
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Jari Arkko, 13:56
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Dave Crocker, 12:32
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Brian E Carpenter, 12:25
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Kathleen Moriarty, 12:24
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Ted Lemon, 12:12
- Re: perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Mary Barnes, 12:07
- perspective of discussion about I-D.farresnickel-harassment, Alia Atlas, 11:59
March 20, 2015
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin-05, Black, David, 22:13
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 20:26
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Dan Harkins, 20:13
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Mark Andrews, 17:37
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Scott Kitterman, 16:55
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 16:46
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, James Woodyatt, 15:57
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Nico Williams, 14:56
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Scott Kitterman, 14:53
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Nico Williams, 14:44
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Scott Kitterman, 14:42
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], joel jaeggli, 13:53
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 13:46
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Jari Arkko, 13:23
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Jari Arkko, 13:08
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Michael StJohns, 12:10
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 11:44
- IETF 92 - Online Registration and Payment Ends Today, IETF Secretariat, 11:42
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Michael StJohns, 10:57
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, John C Klensin, 09:35
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, George Michaelson, 04:07
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Eliot Lear, 02:05
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Dan Harkins, 00:46
March 19, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 22:38
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Brian E Carpenter, 22:29
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Pete Resnick, 22:18
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 21:56
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 21:54
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 21:45
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Nico Williams, 21:41
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Michael StJohns, 20:14
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Michael StJohns, 20:12
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, John C Klensin, 17:48
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 17:32
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Joel M. Halpern, 17:16
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Dan Harkins, 17:05
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Pete Resnick, 16:32
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Dan Harkins, 16:08
- I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb, Michael StJohns, 14:54
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Ted Faber, 12:49
- Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, John C Klensin, 11:57
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, John C Klensin, 11:45
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Michael StJohns, 10:39
- RE: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:38
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Eliot Lear, 10:01
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Stephen Farrell, 09:45
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Jari Arkko, 09:41
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Stewart Bryant, 09:30
- RE: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Adrian Farrel, 09:09
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Pete Resnick, 09:06
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Eliot Lear, 08:41
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Andrew Sullivan, 07:20
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Stephen Farrell, 06:31
- Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 06:17
- Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt, Jari Arkko, 05:04
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Dan Harkins, 00:38
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 00:30
March 17, 2015
- I'm with the Government .. I really need your help., Richard Shockey, 16:45
- secdir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09.txt, Benjamin Kaduk, 15:09
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 14:13
- Call for Papers: The Internet Protocol Journal, Ole Jacobsen, 12:17
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Fred Baker (fred), 11:47
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Sam Hartman, 10:24
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04, Robert Sparks, 09:04
March 16, 2015
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 17:53
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Dave Crocker, 16:57
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Andrew Sullivan, 16:46
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Scott Kitterman, 16:33
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Dave Crocker, 16:28
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Andrew Sullivan, 15:46
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Dave Crocker, 15:38
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Andrew Sullivan, 15:33
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 15:22
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Dave Crocker, 15:03
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:34
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 11:50
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Barry Leiba, 09:03
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 07:48
March 15, 2015
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 18:15
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Sam Hartman, 16:59
- Re: Mailing lists [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Sam Hartman, 16:58
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Sam Hartman, 16:58
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Sam Hartman, 16:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 16:57
- Re: RFC2418bis (was - Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]), Dave Crocker, 15:19
- RFC2418bis (was - Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]), Dave Crocker, 15:08
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], joel jaeggli, 14:46
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 14:07
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Fred Baker (fred), 00:18
March 14, 2015
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Richard Shockey, 17:04
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 16:29
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Henning G Schulzrinne, 15:32
- Re: Mailing lists [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 14:09
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], joel jaeggli, 14:08
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], John C Klensin, 13:55
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:40
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., John Levine, 12:25
- Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], joel jaeggli, 12:07
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., joel jaeggli, 11:52
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Henning G Schulzrinne, 10:38
- RE: As if you don't have enough to read.., John C Klensin, 04:09
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, John C Klensin, 03:11
- RE: As if you don't have enough to read.., Michel Py, 00:07
March 13, 2015
- What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 23:55
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Brian E Carpenter, 23:37
- Mailing lists [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice], Brian E Carpenter, 23:34
- RE: As if you don't have enough to read.., Michel Py, 23:12
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Richard Shockey, 21:48
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Scott Kitterman, 21:22
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Spencer Dawkins, 21:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Spencer Dawkins, 20:39
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:41
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:17
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Roy T. Fielding, 19:07
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Ofer Inbar, 17:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 16:04
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Scott Kitterman, 15:56
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Stephen Farrell, 15:34
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, John C Klensin, 15:08
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Scott Kitterman, 14:20
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, John C Klensin, 13:32
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, John C Klensin, 13:06
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., John Leslie, 12:47
- RE: As if you don't have enough to read.., Michel Py, 12:46
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Miles Fidelman, 12:11
- Re: Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Michael StJohns, 11:48
- Re: Legal review and insurance status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Michael StJohns, 11:31
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Scott Kitterman, 10:58
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., John Leslie, 10:55
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Richard Shockey, 10:40
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, John C Klensin, 10:36
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., manning bill, 10:08
- Re: Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, Sam Hartman, 10:07
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Miles Fidelman, 10:01
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Scott Brim, 09:51
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., John Leslie, 09:17
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Miles Fidelman, 08:43
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., John Leslie, 08:09
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 06:40
- Last call and status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Jari Arkko, 05:56
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-04.txt> (Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes) to Best Current Practice, "Martin J. Dürst", 04:29
- RE: As if you don't have enough to read.., Michel Py, 02:17
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., l.wood, 02:00
March 12, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Nico Williams, 22:05
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Brian E Carpenter, 21:49
- Re: As if you don't have enough to read.., Dean Bogdanovic, 21:08
- As if you don't have enough to read.., Richard Shockey, 20:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-04.txt> (Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes) to Best Current Practice, John C Klensin, 11:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 10:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 10:19
- Trustees License Use of Templates in RFCs, IETF Administrative Director, 10:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell, 10:10
- 10 days to IETF-92, IETF Chair, 10:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 09:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 09:11
- Permit me to highlight..., Fred Baker (fred), 08:43
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-04.txt> (Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes) to Best Current Practice, "Martin J. Dürst", 05:06
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-07, Jari Arkko, 03:08
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, l.wood, 01:13
March 11, 2015
- IETF 92 - Early Bird Cutoff Friday & Google’s Chris DiBona to Speak, IETF Secretariat, 13:58
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-07, Russ Housley, 13:09
- RE: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Adrian Farrel, 12:31
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Ted Lemon, 12:27
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Yoav Nir, 12:27
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, John Levine, 12:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 12:22
- Legal review and insurance status of draft-farrresnickel-harassment, Ray Pelletier, 12:17
- Review of: draft-farrresnickel-harassment-06, Dave Crocker, 12:09
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Yoav Nir, 12:08
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Ted Lemon, 11:56
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Marc Blanchet, 11:55
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Ted Lemon, 11:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Randy Bush, 08:56
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Ted Lemon, 08:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Yoav Nir, 08:42
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Yoav Nir, 08:15
- RE: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich), 06:37
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, l.wood, 05:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 04:45
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:22
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Loa Andersson, 03:49
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:46
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Viktor Dukhovni, 02:35
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 02:16
March 10, 2015
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, James Woodyatt, 17:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 17:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 16:59
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, joel jaeggli, 16:59
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment, Jari Arkko, 16:51
- RE: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Adrian Farrel, 16:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, James Woodyatt, 13:38
- Call for volunteers: IETF Website Revamp Project Review Committee, Joe Hildebrand, 12:05
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Doug Royer, 11:28
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Dave Cridland, 11:24
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Doug Royer, 11:17
- RE: [trill] Announcement of the move of L2TPEXT, LISP, and TRILL, Susan Hares, 10:31
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 10:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 10:29
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Sam Hartman, 10:28
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, David Borman, 10:28
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, George, Wes, 09:24
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, t.p., 09:19
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Fred Baker (fred), 09:05
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Jari Arkko, 08:28
- Code Sprint in Dallas, IETF Chair, 08:08
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 07:59
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, t.p., 07:33
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Randy Bush, 07:13
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, l.wood, 07:10
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, t.p., 04:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Stewart Bryant, 03:46
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Randy Bush, 01:38
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Doug Royer, 00:49
March 09, 2015
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, John C Klensin, 23:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 22:19
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Brian E Carpenter, 22:16
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Allison Mankin, 21:57
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Randy Bush, 21:45
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Brian E Carpenter, 21:37
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, John Levine, 20:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Nico Williams, 18:29
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:16
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Doug Royer, 18:10
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Russ Housley, 17:52
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Scott Kitterman, 17:47
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Lou Berger, 17:45
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 17:25
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Nico Williams, 17:14
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Yoav Nir, 17:07
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment, Dave Crocker, 16:45
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, John C Klensin, 16:27
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Jari Arkko, 16:09
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, Paul Hoffman, 16:09
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt), David Farmer, 16:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter, 16:00
- Re: Unhelpful draft names, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 15:59
- Unhelpful draft names, Brian E Carpenter, 15:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Nico Williams, 15:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Michael StJohns, 15:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Nico Williams, 15:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick, 15:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 15:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 14:51
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment, Jari Arkko, 14:50
- Announcement of the move of L2TPEXT, LISP, and TRILL, Brian Haberman, 12:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 10:39
- Last Call re-review of draft-ietf-idr-error-handling, Tom Taylor, 09:53
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 09:51
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply, lizho(_dot_)jin(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com, 09:50
- Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09, Sam Hartman, 09:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Sam Hartman, 09:49
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels, Robert Sparks, 08:31
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels, George, Wes, 08:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:01
March 06, 2015
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 20:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 15:51
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels, Robert Sparks, 15:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:22
- IETF 92 - Early-Bird Registration Ends 13 March 2015, IETF Secretariat, 12:17
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 11:45
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 11:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice, John Leslie, 10:39
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 10:17
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 10:16
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 10:15
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Nico Williams, 10:14
- Downtime notice - revised times, Matt Larson, 10:14
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 10:13
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 10:12
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:12
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:11
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:11
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:10
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:09
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:08
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 10:08
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 10:07
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, manning bill, 10:06
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, manning bill, 10:06
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Paul Hoffman, 09:43
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels, George, Wes, 09:18
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels, George, Wes, 09:16
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Lars-Johan Liman, 07:01
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Lars-Johan Liman, 06:27
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 06:22
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Lars-Johan Liman, 06:02
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 03:05
March 05, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Mark Andrews, 22:08
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Andrew Sullivan, 19:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 19:47
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Mark Andrews, 17:58
- Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Andrew Sullivan, 17:28
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Mark Andrews, 16:03
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Mark Andrews, 15:49
- Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work, t.p., 11:56
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, manning bill, 11:47
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, John C Klensin, 11:40
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Paul Hoffman, 11:37
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, manning bill, 11:01
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Jari Arkko, 10:50
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Paul Hoffman, 10:49
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 10:12
- Downtime notice, Matt Larson, 10:11
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 10:10
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:09
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 10:08
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Jari Arkko, 06:56
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04, Jari Arkko, 06:46
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-04, Jari Arkko, 06:31
- Re: Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-27, Jari Arkko, 05:45
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Jari Arkko, 02:47
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 01:49
- Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work, Benoit Claise, 01:48
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 01:14
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 00:51
March 04, 2015
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 23:38
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 23:32
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 23:29
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Mark Andrews, 22:56
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Paul Hoffman, 22:43
- Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work, Andy Bierman, 22:42
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Mark Andrews, 22:41
- Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Pete Resnick, 22:37
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Mark Andrews, 22:25
- last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis, Jari Arkko, 21:44
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 20:57
- Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice, Jari Arkko, 20:57
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 17:41
- IAB statement on Liaison Compensation, Abdussalam Baryun, 17:21
- Re: IAB statement on Liaison Compensation, Mark Nottingham, 17:18
- IAB statement on Liaison Compensation, IAB Chair, 14:27
- Call for Papers: IAB/ISOC Workshop on Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale, IAB Chair, 14:17
- Last Call comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09.txt, Adrian Farrel, 09:36
March 03, 2015
- Re: [dnssd] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt> (Requirements for Scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extensions) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 19:28
- Re: [dnssd] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt> (Requirements for Scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extensions) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire, 19:08
- Re: [dnssd] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt> (Requirements for Scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extensions) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 19:04
- Re: [dnssd] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt> (Requirements for Scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extensions) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire, 18:10
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04, Robert Sparks, 11:54
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04, Cyrus Daboo, 11:22
- Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04, Robert Sparks, 11:03
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Dave Cridland, 08:32
March 02, 2015
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Ted Lemon, 21:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 18:52
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Pranesh Prakash, 17:57
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Dave Cridland, 17:21
- Re: draft-newton-link-rr (was Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource) Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 15:48
- Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work, Benoit Claise, 15:24
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Abdussalam Baryun, 14:55
- Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 12:58
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:45
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 12:36
- TSVDIR LC review: <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt> (The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)) to Proposed Standard>, Allison Mankin, 11:06
- Re: draft-newton-link-rr (was Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource) Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Newton, 10:35
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 09:52
- Re: draft-newton-link-rr (was Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource) Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 09:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 09:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-03.txt> (Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)) to Internet Standard, John William Atwood, 09:12
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 09:12
March 01, 2015
- Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-28, Peter Yee, 22:48
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Ted Lemon, 20:04
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), joel jaeggli, 19:56
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:02
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 16:42
- Money is the answer? Hum.., Richard Shockey, 16:36
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Ted Lemon, 15:44
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Viktor Dukhovni, 14:27
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Pranesh Prakash, 14:05
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Brian E Carpenter, 13:38
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Andrew Sullivan, 11:08
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Pranesh Prakash, 09:54
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Donald Eastlake, 09:52
- Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:51
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), John C Klensin, 08:39
- Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees), Randy Bush, 03:34