Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis

> > 3) Mark Andrews' suggestion of further requirements regarding EDNS0 has
> > not been discussed, but I would note that at this stage we should not add
> > major requirements without substantial community portion indicating that
> > this is needed. I'm not hearing it.
> I suspect this is because the root servers actually correctly
> implement EDNS.  If a server was changed to a implementation that
> failed to correctly implement EDNS that would change.
Perhaps. What do others think?

Jari

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail