ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents

2015-03-28 10:13:45



28 mar 2015 kl. 09:18 skrev Stephen Farrell 
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>:


Max,

On 28/03/15 13:47, Massimiliano Pala wrote:
I think that allowing this as a common practice is a bit dangerous.

What danger do you perceive here? I'm not seeing it. Nor do I see any
need at all for an "official" IETF-wide position, and in fact, such a
position is quite likely to be counterproductive IMO.


+1 we have enough work already wo having to invent stuff like this to keep us 
busy

And as Phill said, re-numbering, if it breaks code, isn't a good
plan. Asking if it would break code, etc. on the trans list, is a
totally reasonable question btw and that discussion is already
happening there.

S.

PS: This isn't about a MIB, but a PKI thing.