John,
On 13/03/15 18:05, John C Klensin wrote:
However, the responses by a few IESG members to comments about
the IESG's exempting itself (and other parts of the leadership
[1]) from the provisions seems to call for additional comment
and probably a few more issues for the list of topics needing
addressing.
I don't believe the above matches what the document says at all.
The IESG didn't "exempt" itself from anything - the ombudsteam
can very clearly exclude an AD from one or more meetings, just
as with any IETF participant. (If that is not clear, it needs
to be, but I think it is.)
S.