I'm persuaded that further debate could do more harm than help, and I don't
want to open up further debate that would harm the effort to adopt a good
policy. I'm confident that an ombudsteam can use good judgment to be
sufficiently inclusive whatever the policy lists in the text.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jari Arkko
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> wrote:
I wanted to say that I’m in agreement with Adrian on this. Ultimately,
no list will be complete, some judgment needs to apply, and I
think we’ve covered this in the text better than if we attempted
to expand the list.
(And I am, of course, in agreement with Stewart that things that
he lists are definitely important and certainly should not be misused
in any professional discussion.)
Jari
--
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)nestlabs(_dot_)com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering