On 10/03/2015 21:59, Jari Arkko wrote:
I wanted to say that I’m in agreement with Adrian on this. Ultimately,
no list will be complete, some judgment needs to apply, and I
think we’ve covered this in the text better than if we attempted
to expand the list.
(And I am, of course, in agreement with Stewart that things that
he lists are definitely important and certainly should not be misused
in any professional discussion.)
Jari
Jari
I fail to see why the IETF which has no significant expertise
in this area has chosen to make up its own list rather than
using one put together by professionals.
I did not just think up those additional items, they are part
of a list that experts on the subject put together for
example:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
However given the degree on integration on this subject I
am sure it will align with EU position on the subject.
This is very much a case where we should use the more
encompassing list rather than an abbreviated one.
The most glaring omission from the IETF list is of course
disability.
- Stewart