On 3/26/2015 9:41 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Michael StJohns
<mstjohns(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net
<mailto:mstjohns(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net>> wrote:
...
And then there's
the whole confidentiality model the Nomcom and CBs are currently
tied to and how that would need to be morphed to enable this.
[MB] And the latter is my biggest concern. I think this feedback model
has the potential to seriously compromise the Nomcom process. My
interpretation of the process as a past chair was that providing this
feedback actually violates the confidentiality of the Nomcom process. I
know it happens unofficially, but I don't think that's ideal.
[/MB]
I do not understand the nature of this confidentiality concern.
If nomcom interviews disclose a pattern of statement that AD Brute is
confrontational and intimidating in their interactions style, then
having a chat with the AD, describing the pattern of perceptions and the
need for a softer and more respectful and more collaborative style, does
not violate anyone's confidentiality.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net