Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

t.p. <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com> wrote:
    > Interesting to see this at the top of the list, a classic top-down
    > management approach.  Even in top-down managed organisations (which is
    > not how I view the IETF), I see bottom-up review, which in this case
    > would be the AD sitting down with the WG Chairs in their Area to say,
    > how am I doing?  I think that that would be a better fit for the IETF.

This is a good thing to do period.
But, I don't think it address strange/rude/inappropriate interactions that
seem to occur from my anecdotal observation in cross-area review, or between
peers rather than up-down.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature