ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb

2015-03-20 15:57:01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Jari Arkko 
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> wrote:


I’m not trying to argue that the text cannot be improved, but I wanted to
let you know that the team did not take all input without questions asked
:-)


I first read the clause in question as Pete Resnick explained it in
previous messages. I support retaining it.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Michael StJohns 
<mstjohns(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net>
 wrote:

[...]  If its also  (or only) a "legal" issue, we direct the affected
participants to engage elsewhere and keep our mitts out of that part of it.
[...]


I oppose adoption of that policy. I can't see how that would amount to
anything more than a useless parody of a real process, which is worse than
having none at all.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)nestlabs(_dot_)com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering