On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Jari Arkko
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> wrote:
I’m not trying to argue that the text cannot be improved, but I wanted to
let you know that the team did not take all input without questions asked
:-)
I first read the clause in question as Pete Resnick explained it in
previous messages. I support retaining it.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Michael StJohns
<mstjohns(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net>
wrote:
[...] If its also (or only) a "legal" issue, we direct the affected
participants to engage elsewhere and keep our mitts out of that part of it.
[...]
I oppose adoption of that policy. I can't see how that would amount to
anything more than a useless parody of a real process, which is worse than
having none at all.
--
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)nestlabs(_dot_)com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering