Hi Pete,
The example still uses a Web home page, even though this use of the URI record
isn't specified nor used by any implementation I'm aware of (and even if there
were one, it wouldn't be interoperable).
Changing to another example would fix this.
Cheers,
On 5 Mar 2015, at 9:25 am, Pete Resnick
<presnick(_at_)qti(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> wrote:
[Explicitly Cc'ing folks who participated in the thread.]
On 2/27/15 10:24 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
I'm going to ask Patrik to publish a revised ID at this point, which I
expect to see in the next couple of days.
The new version of the document (-12) is out, announcement attached. It is
now Informational, it removes the discussion of flag "D" for NAPTR, and adds
a bit of discussion to security considerations. I would appreciate folks
giving it a sniff and making sure it addresses your earlier concerns. If so,
I'll go ahead and ballot it for the 12-March IESG telechat.
Thanks,
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
--- Begin Message ---
A new version (-12) has been submitted for draft-faltstrom-uri:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-faltstrom-uri-12.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-uri/
Diff from previous version:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-faltstrom-uri-12
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
IETF Secretariat.
--- End Message ---
--
Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/