Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uni

All, specifically Mark,

This was a stupid editorial mistake by myself. It should have been replaced. So 
much for merging documents when being too tired 23:00 in the evening on the day 
the AD had given me a deadline... My apologies.

Pete, please let me know when you want a new version, -13.txt

   Patrik

> On 5 mar 2015, at 00:41, Mark Nottingham <mnot(_at_)mnot(_dot_)net> wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> The example still uses a Web home page, even though this use of the URI 
> record isn't specified nor used by any implementation I'm aware of (and even 
> if there were one, it wouldn't be interoperable).
>
> Changing to another example would fix this.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 5 Mar 2015, at 9:25 am, Pete Resnick 
> > <presnick(_at_)qti(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> wrote:
> >
> > [Explicitly Cc'ing folks who participated in the thread.]
> >
> > On 2/27/15 10:24 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> > > I'm going to ask Patrik to publish a revised ID at this point, which I 
> > > expect to see in the next couple of days.
> > The new version of the document (-12) is out, announcement attached. It is 
> > now Informational, it removes the discussion of flag "D" for NAPTR, and adds 
> > a bit of discussion to security considerations. I would appreciate folks 
> > giving it a sniff and making sure it addresses your earlier concerns. If so, 
> > I'll go ahead and ballot it for the 12-March IESG telechat.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > pr
> >
> > --
> > Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
> <Attached Message.eml>
> >
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail