--On Saturday, March 14, 2015 12:07 -0700 joel jaeggli
<joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com> wrote:
First, we've had no previous experience with the "recall
process". The example I assure you are referring to was one
in which commitments to sign had been collected and it was
clear that the recall process would be initiated if the
individual involved did not resign, but he did.
You are incorrect, the process was initiated.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg
10887.html
It was not necessary for it to run to completion.
You are correct. My apologies. It was, as I think you pointed
out, never fully initiated to remove someone for bad behavior or
malfeasance.
The main point of my note, however, remains that the recall
process --at least past the point of the Secretariat approving
petitions and announcing the petition and signer-- is
inconsistent with claims of confidentiality.
john