I think that the security considerations in -10 are better than what we
seem to be wordsmithing on the list.
My preference is to call -10 good enough in this regard especially given
that it is informational.
I don't support a desire to reduce the strength of security warnings in
the document, as I think John may be asking for.
However personally I don' have the energy to really engage in much more
of a discussion for this document.
I think AS work is quite important, and I hope that happens at a time
when I have energy to participate but it's far more important to me that
it happen regardless of my participation.