On 3/9/15 3:14 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
we did discuss the leadership-as-respondent issues during IESG Evaluation, and
we concluded keeping these procedures and recall separate was best. Pete or
Adrian can give details if you're interested.
The short answer is that the IESG generally thought that "crossing the
streams" was a bad idea. Imagine that we do get to the particular point
of horror, that someone in leadership has harassed someone in such a way
that the Ombudsteam concludes the only appropriate remedy is that they
are unable to attend future meetings or participate in list discussions,
*and* that person refused to resign their post. Even if they keep the
fact of the harassment confidential and simply said, "I will be unable
to attend meetings in the future for personal reasons, nor will I be
able to participate in WG list discussions, but I still wish to remain
as AD", that's really plenty enough impetus for a recall committee to be
formed and remove the person from their post.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478