On 04/10/2015 07:44, Doug Ewell wrote:
So, as many folks have been saying, by all means provide the more-secure
option for users who want it — but don't use that as a reason to take
away the existing option for other people who depend on it.
That sounds like words to live by/a sound operating principle.
Someone fire up the T-shirt press.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP:
http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature