I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
Reviewer: David Black
Review Date: April 20, 2015
IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
should be fixed before publication.
This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 forwarding
with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses. It's clear, well explained
easy to understand, plus refreshingly short. Nicely done!
Major issues: (none)
Minor issues: (none)
Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-).
-- Abstract
Hardware and software
algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but
implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length.
"algorithms" isn't the right word.
I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding"
idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of
draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05
Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david(_dot_)black(_at_)emc(_dot_)com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------