I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2015-7-1
IETF LC End Date: 2015-7-2
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
According to the abstract this document specifies a set of common
methodologies and procedures designed to characterize the overall behavior
of a Device Under Test (DUT), subject to an ISSU event. My reading is that
it captures the typical procedures and as such is an informational document.
It does not recommend any specific procedure yet it RECOMMEND in section 7
defines normative recommendation of which parameters SHOULD be reported in
what I understand is a written statement. I was wondering if all parameters
are needed and when you can report only part of them , maybe just make it
non normative
Nits/editorial comments: