ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)

2015-07-02 05:20:09

inline

Simon Josefsson wrote:
Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(_at_)firsthand(_dot_)net> writes:

Any chance of adding some words to the effect that RFCs are free both as
in gratis and in the freedom sense?

Makes sense, but be careful with words.  RFCs aren't free in all freedom
senses, for example you can't even include them in FOSS projects since
RFCs aren't licensed freely enough.

/Simon


Indeed a good clarification. I wasn't referring to the content but
access to and use of the RFCs.

C




That should dispel any views that this is more than a metadata play
for academic brownie points.

Funny though isn't it.. back with CNRI again.

Christian





Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Stephane,

Seriously?

"if we want something widely recognized in the information and
documentation world" the only realistic answer today is DOIs.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter


Christian de Larrinaga  FBCS, CITP,
-------------------------
@ FirstHand
-------------------------
+44 7989 386778
cdel(_at_)firsthand(_dot_)net
-------------------------



-- 
Christian de Larrinaga  FBCS, CITP,
-------------------------
@ FirstHand
-------------------------
+44 7989 386778
cdel(_at_)firsthand(_dot_)net
-------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>