On 14 Jul 2015, at 22:16, Ted Hardie wrote:
Further, I believe this stretches the "special handling" requirement of RFC
6761 to the breaking point. This does not describe special handling _within
the DNS_, but instead removes a portion of the global namespace from the DNS
at all. To me, at least, this does not seem to me to meet the analogy RFC
6761 provides to IP multicast ranges or local addresses. Whether it is
permitted or not by RFC 6761, it is a bad idea.
Speaking personally I think the intention of RFC6761 was to allow any kind of
splitting of the namespace used by for example the global DNS so that there
would not be any confusion and/or questions on how to resolve a specific
string. See other similar specifications regarding .EXAMPLE, .LOCAL and such.
And I think this is exactly the kind of need that exists for .ONION. The
reference (normative or informative) is something I agree can be discussed
whether it should not have been normative.
If the wording in RFC6761 is such that we do not agree that this is the
process, but instead that RFC6761 is only for specifications that use the DNS
for resolution, then I think RFC6761 should be made more clear, and not this
document.
RFC6761 should be about namespace management, which I think is what we discuss
here.
Because of this, I think this RFC should be published modulo resolution of the
question about the reference.
My opinion only,
Likewise ;-)
Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature