Coming to consensus on revised NomCom qualification seemed to be the one
issue where there were lots of ideas but not much agreement. The expired
draft captures one such idea but I wouldn't go so far as to claim it had
any kind of consensus at all.
The rest of the changes in there now didn't seem to be ruffling any
feathers.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Joe Hildebrand <hildjj(_at_)cursive(_dot_)net>
wrote:
It's worth finishing the work. What else did you think was left before
doing a last call?
--
Joe Hildebrand
On 24 Aug 2015, at 22:01, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Some months ago I started the work of editing a revision to the NomCom
procedures (RFC7437bis). We made progress on some points, but seem to
have
stalled on revising the requirements for qualifying to serve on NomCom.
The draft I have recently expired. Is there any interest in taking
another
run at this now? Alternatively, is it worth publishing what we did
accomplish, and leaving that one point for a later attempt?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/
-MSK