ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

2016-01-15 17:52:32
Joel M. Halpern wrote:
On the minor note, I had not realized those were already relevant
parameters.  Anyone using this can reasonably be expected to know that,
so it is not a big deal.  Given that it would only take one sentence, it
might be nice to add the statement anyway.

We can certainly add text to point out that this is a limitation of RFC 6716, e.g., "The duration of an Opus packet as defined in RFC 6716 can be any multiple..."

For 48 kHz, we might say, "It is possible to run an Opus decoder at other sampling rates, but all of them evenly divide 48 kHz. Therefore, the value in the granule position field always counts samples assuming a 48 kHz decoding rate..."