IETF Discussion (date)
January 30, 2016
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Mark Nottingham, 20:50
- A standard for XML - JSON mapping., Jeyan Gopalakrishnan, 20:27
- Review of draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, S Moonesamy, 14:52
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, John C Klensin, 14:18
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Brian E Carpenter, 13:10
- RE: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur], 02:31
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Eliot Lear, 02:28
January 29, 2016
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, S Moonesamy, 17:41
- Re: AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation, Miles Fidelman, 13:56
- RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard, Jim Schaad, 13:46
- Re: AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation, John Levine, 12:13
- AirBnB, was Re: Hotel situation, Livingood, Jason, 11:50
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 11:10
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ron, 10:35
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ron, 10:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ron, 10:34
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Benson Schliesser, 10:33
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Jean-Marc Valin, 10:32
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Jean-Marc Valin, 10:32
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Andrew G. Malis, 09:45
- Re: long-term archiving, Theodore V Faber, 09:45
- Re: long-term archiving, Jim Gettys, 08:53
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Eliot Lear, 08:12
- Re: long-term archiving, Tony Finch, 05:29
- Re: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 01:36
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 00:10
January 28, 2016
- Re: long-term archiving, John R Levine, 23:55
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: long-term archiving, Randy Fischer, 23:46
- Re: long-term archiving, lloyd.wood, 23:39
- Re: long-term archiving, lloyd.wood, 23:36
- Re: long-term archiving, John Levine, 20:19
- Re: long-term archiving, Brian E Carpenter, 20:17
- Re: long-term archiving, Randy Fischer, 19:34
- Re: long-term archiving, Theodore V Faber, 19:01
- Re: long-term archiving, Brian E Carpenter, 18:11
- Re: long-term archiving, Joe Touch, 17:55
- Re: long-term archiving, Joe Touch, 17:53
- Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance, Ben Campbell, 17:44
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Doug Barton, 17:37
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Doug Barton, 17:29
- RE: [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-block-18.txt> (Block-wise transfers in CoAP) to Proposed Standard, Jim Schaad, 17:21
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Michael Richardson, 16:33
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Timothy B. Terriberry, 16:10
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 15:08
- Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance, Adam Roach, 15:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 14:24
- Re: long-term archiving, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:00
- Re: long-term archiving, Theodore V Faber, 13:50
- Re: long-term archiving, John Levine, 13:45
- Re: long-term archiving, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 13:44
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Ross Finlayson, 13:38
- Re: long-term archiving, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:32
- Re: long-term archiving, Brian E Carpenter, 13:15
- Re: long-term archiving, Alessandro Vesely, 12:53
- Early review of the RFC Format documents welcome, IAB Executive Administrative Manager, 12:48
- all for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations, IAB Executive Administrative Manager, 12:42
- Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance, Alissa Cooper, 11:22
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Bob Hinden, 11:02
- Re: long-term archiving, Dave Crocker, 10:24
- Re: long-term archiving (was: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- ...), Theodore V Faber, 09:22
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:33
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Tony Finch, 08:17
- long-term archiving (was: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- ...), Dave Crocker, 07:31
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Eliot Lear, 06:56
- Re: Last Call: <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic) to Historic, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 06:55
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Jari Arkko, 06:24
- RE: Last Call: <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic) to Historic, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 05:56
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Carsten Bormann, 02:58
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Doug Royer, 02:23
January 27, 2016
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Ross Finlayson, 23:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice, Ben Campbell, 20:34
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice, Ben Campbell, 17:32
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Doug Barton, 15:51
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Stephen Farrell, 15:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ben Campbell, 15:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10.txt> (Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sparks, 14:45
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Brian E Carpenter, 13:44
- IANA considerations and expert review across different streams (was Re: [IAB] Call for comment: <draft-iab-rfc5741bis-01> (On RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates)), Robert Sparks, 13:25
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Doug Royer, 11:51
- Re: xml2rfc as a requirement for authors?, HANSEN, TONY L, 11:00
- Re: RFC format evolution and IETF documents, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:52
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Ted Hardie, 09:51
- RFC format evolution and IETF documents, IETF Chair, 09:33
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Jari Arkko, 08:02
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Fernando Gont, 05:36
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, John C Klensin, 05:26
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, John C Klensin, 05:07
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Tony Finch, 04:46
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Randy Bush, 04:43
- Re: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-07, Harald Alvestrand, 04:11
January 26, 2016
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 21:43
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, John C Klensin, 20:40
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Dave Crocker, 18:35
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Brian E Carpenter, 18:25
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Dave Crocker, 18:14
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Stephen Farrell, 17:58
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Joel M. Halpern, 17:57
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Melinda Shore, 17:55
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Benson Schliesser, 17:42
- Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3, Jari Arkko, 17:20
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Melinda Shore, 16:51
- Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:49
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Paul Hoffman, 16:40
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Ietf-and-github -- Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups, Ross Finlayson, 16:04
- Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3, Jari Arkko, 15:16
- Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:56
- Re: IETF mail server and SSLv3, tom p., 11:06
January 25, 2016
- RE: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur], 20:14
- IETF mail server and SSLv3, IETF Chair, 13:40
- Call for feedback and nominations for the IAOC appointment by the IESG, IETF Chair, 13:16
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, Joe Touch, 13:05
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, GTW, 11:01
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, Eric Burger, 10:50
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, John Levine, 10:35
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, Behcet Sarikaya, 10:15
- Re: Should I make and donate a patent to Open Invention Network?, Toerless Eckert, 09:25
January 22, 2016
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 15:23
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:27
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 13:15
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 13:00
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 12:31
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Patrik Fältström, 11:51
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:18
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Cyrus Daboo, 10:17
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Patrik Fältström, 10:04
- Re: DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance, John Levine, 10:01
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:55
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eliot Lear, 09:17
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eggert, Lars, 09:00
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eggert, Lars, 08:59
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:37
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eliot Lear, 03:42
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eggert, Lars, 03:10
- DISPATCH and strategies for standards maintenance, Harald Alvestrand, 01:33
January 21, 2016
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Hildebrand, 23:58
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 12:07
- IAOC/IASA procedureal documents (was: Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review), John C Klensin, 10:31
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06, Jari Arkko, 07:14
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-09, Jari Arkko, 07:02
January 20, 2016
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 23:34
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Roy T. Fielding, 22:04
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Stephen Farrell, 20:39
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:04
- IAOC - was Re: [IAOC] Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, Scott O. Bradner, 18:34
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Mark Nottingham, 18:33
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, Scott O. Bradner, 18:13
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, John C Klensin, 17:49
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 17:28
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, John C Klensin, 17:06
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 16:42
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-09, Peter Yee, 15:35
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, Scott O. Bradner, 15:16
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, John C Klensin, 15:14
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, John C Klensin, 14:47
- RE: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:27
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, Brian E Carpenter, 13:30
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Brian E Carpenter, 13:08
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 12:50
- Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, John C Klensin, 12:17
- Proposed Changes to IAOC Admin Procedures for Review, IETF Administrative Director, 10:56
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:07
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:47
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Matthew Kerwin, 02:45
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eliot Lear, 01:23
January 19, 2016
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 20:30
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 20:17
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 20:13
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:54
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Barry Leiba, 19:50
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:47
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 19:03
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 18:59
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 18:52
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Touch, 18:51
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Barry Leiba, 18:21
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Barry Leiba, 18:17
- Re: yang model easy editor, Benoit Claise, 15:44
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:56
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Brian E Carpenter, 13:29
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:03
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, tom p., 12:10
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Ron, 09:51
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Ralph Giles, 09:50
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:06
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:57
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Julian Reschke, 07:49
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:48
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eggert, Lars, 05:03
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Matthew Kerwin, 03:24
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eliot Lear, 02:47
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Eggert, Lars, 02:34
- Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries, Joe Hildebrand, 01:47
January 15, 2016
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Joel M. Halpern, 21:29
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Ben Campbell, 21:21
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Joel M. Halpern, 18:43
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Timothy B. Terriberry, 17:52
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Joel M. Halpern, 17:49
- IANA customer survey 2015, IETF Chair, 17:46
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10, Joel M. Halpern, 16:28
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06, Russ Housley, 14:38
- Re: IETF turns 30, Brian E Carpenter, 13:20
- Re: IETF turns 30, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:50
- Re: IETF turns 30, Eliot Lear, 00:00
January 14, 2016
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: IETF turns 30, John C Klensin, 18:01
- Re: yang model easy editor, Riccardo Bernardini, 15:30
- Re: yang model easy editor, Doug Ewell, 15:25
- Re: IETF turns 30, Eliot Lear, 08:48
- Re: IETF turns 30, Alexandre Petrescu, 08:34
- RE: IETF turns 30, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 07:27
- RE: IETF turns 30, Mikael Abrahamsson, 07:24
- RE: IETF turns 30, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 04:51
- IETF turns 30, IETF Chair, 04:45
- IAB workshop on IOT semantic interoperability, IETF Chair, 04:33
- Re: On email and web security, George Michaelson, 00:35
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 00:23
January 13, 2016
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Barton, 22:27
- Re: On email and web security, John Levine, 20:43
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Barton, 18:35
- Re: On email and web security, John Levine, 17:30
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Royer, 16:34
- yang model easy editor, Hosnieh Rafiee, 16:02
- Re: On email and web security, Matthew Kerwin, 15:34
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Royer, 15:24
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Barton, 15:13
- Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?), Randall Gellens, 11:30
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:03
- Re: On email and web security, Dave Cridland, 02:23
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Barton, 00:34
January 12, 2016
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:27
- Re: Joyce Reynolds, Doug Barton, 19:45
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Barton, 19:33
- Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?), John C Klensin, 18:28
- Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?), Randall Gellens, 12:17
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Oauth-security-reports -- Information about security vulnerabilities concerning the OAuth specifications and OAuth implementations, Philip Kizer, 10:37
- Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?), Eliot Lear, 08:34
- Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?), John C Klensin, 08:25
January 10, 2016
- RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation, Christer Holmberg, 16:03
- Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation, John Levine, 13:17
- Re: Hotel situation, Ole Jacobsen, 11:50
- Re: Hotel situation, John C Klensin, 10:58
- Re: Virtual BOFs, John C Klensin, 08:40
- Re: email change, Alexey Eromenko, 05:23
- email change, Dr. Sandeep Joshi [MU - Jaipur], 05:11
- Re: Hotel situation, Toerless Eckert, 02:54
January 09, 2016
- Re: Hotel situation, Randall Gellens, 23:33
- Re: Virtual BOFs, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 22:47
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Doug Barton, 18:49
- Re: Virtual BOFs, John C Klensin, 14:54
- Re: Virtual BOFs, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:26
- Re: Hotel situation, Lloyd Wood, 14:25
- Re: Virtual BOFs, Brian E Carpenter, 12:40
- Virtual BOFs (was: Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111), John C Klensin, 08:55
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, thomas nadeau, 07:57
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Leif Johansson, 04:37
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Jari Arkko, 03:21
January 08, 2016
- Re: not really the current Hotel situation, John Levine, 23:06
- Re: Hotel situation, Randall Gellens, 18:24
- Re: Hotel situation, Randall Gellens, 18:13
- Re: Hotel situation, Randall Gellens, 18:11
- "resource-rich urban environments" (was "Re: Hotel situation"), Randall Gellens, 17:54
- Re: Hotel situation, Randall Gellens, 17:32
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Michael Richardson, 13:24
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Mary Barnes, 11:27
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Lou Berger, 11:14
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Michael StJohns, 11:08
- Re: comment on the proposed new note well, GTW, 09:55
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Nadeau Thomas, 09:51
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Leslie Daigle, 09:39
- Re: comment on the proposed new note well, Jorge Contreras, 09:17
- comment on the proposed new note well, Keith Moore, 08:31
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Scott Bradner, 06:30
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Leif Johansson, 05:25
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, John C Klensin, 02:26
January 07, 2016
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Ole Jacobsen, 13:41
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, John C Klensin, 13:08
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Behcet Sarikaya, 10:34
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, Ray Pelletier, 10:03
- Re: Call for nominations for the IAOC appointment by the IESG, IETF Chair, 07:57
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07, Jari Arkko, 07:11
- Re: Gen-RTP LC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-13, Jari Arkko, 06:48
January 06, 2016
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation, lloyd.wood, 20:57
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation, John Levine, 20:37
- Re: Hotel situation, lloyd.wood, 19:02
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-cdni-control-triggers-11, Jari Arkko, 18:45
- Re: Hotel situation, Ole Jacobsen, 17:48
- Re: Hotel situation, Randy Bush, 17:39
- Re: Hotel situation, Richard Shockey, 17:38
- Re: Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, John C Klensin, 17:32
- Re: Hotel situation, Paul Wouters, 17:09
- Re: Hotel situation, Randy Bush, 17:02
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-mailarch-improvements-02.txt, Robert Sparks, 15:22
- Re: Hotel situation, Bob Hinden, 14:01
- Venue Announcement for IETFs 98, 99, 102 and 111, IETF Administrative Director, 10:12
- RE: [spring] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06.txt> (SPRING Problem Statement and Requirements) to Informational RFC, Alexander Vainshtein, 10:12
- Re: Hotel situation, tom p., 04:16
January 05, 2016
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-03.txt> (Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status) to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 20:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-03.txt> (Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status) to Informational RFC, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-03.txt> (Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status) to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 18:52
- Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hotel situation, Ray Pelletier, 15:46
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, George, Wes, 14:10
- Re: Hotel situation, Jared Mauch, 10:52
- Re: Hotel situation, Ole Jacobsen, 10:19
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Ted Lemon, 10:19
- Re: Fwd: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, dave taht, 10:18
- Re: Hotel situation, Nadeau Thomas, 09:32
- Re: Hotel situation, John C Klensin, 09:02
- Re: Venue Selection Objectives and Criteria was Re: Hotel situation, George, Wes, 09:01
- Re: Response to Jari's blog, Mary Barnes, 08:36
- Re: Hotel situation, John C Klensin, 08:35
- Re: Hotel situation, Tim Chown, 08:17
- Re: Hotel situation, Dave Crocker, 08:08
- Re: Hotel situation, John C Klensin, 07:28
- Re: Hotel situation, Christian Hopps, 06:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-03.txt> (Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status) to Informational RFC, Philip Homburg, 06:41
- Re: Hotel situation, l.wood, 06:39
- Re: Hotel situation, Jari Arkko, 05:54
- Contributions (Re: Proposed New Note Well), Harald Alvestrand, 04:00
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Harald Alvestrand, 03:51
- Re: Response to Jari's blog - IPv6, Olle E. Johansson, 03:28
- Re: Hotel situation, Stewart Bryant, 03:16
- Re: Response to Jari's blog, Olle E. Johansson, 03:16
January 04, 2016
- RE: Tom Taylor, Hui Deng, 20:40
- Re: [discuss] Questions, Randy Bush, 19:27
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Stephan Wenger, 19:12
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 18:35
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Jorge Contreras, 18:24
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Jorge Contreras, 18:18
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Stephan Wenger, 16:37
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Mark Nottingham, 15:46
- Re: Hotel situation, John C Klensin, 15:34
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 15:31
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Dave Cridland, 15:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice, Ben Campbell, 14:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-undeployed-03.txt> (Moving Outdated TCP Extensions and TCP-related Documents to Historic and Informational Status) to Informational RFC, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:54
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Scott O. Bradner, 14:36
- Re: Hotel situation, Jari Arkko, 14:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice, Harald Alvestrand, 14:25
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, John C Klensin, 14:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> (Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.) to Best Current Practice, Ben Campbell, 14:03
- Re: Hotel situation, John Levine, 14:01
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Scott O. Bradner, 13:48
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Scott O. Bradner, 13:41
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 13:37
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter, 13:29
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, Doug Ewell, 13:16
- Re: [discuss] Questions, joel jaeggli, 13:15
- Re: [discuss] Questions, Christopher Morrow, 13:01
- Re: Hotel situation, Mary Barnes, 12:21
- RE: Hotel situation, Eric Gray, 10:39
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Jim Gettys, 10:28
- Re: Proposed New Note Well, John C Klensin, 10:05
- RE: Proposed New Note Well, Adrian Farrel, 09:59
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Donald Eastlake, 09:49
- Proposed New Note Well, IESG Secretary, 09:41
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Jari Arkko, 09:38
January 02, 2016
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:25
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:13
- Re: On email and web security, John Levine, 09:38
- Re: On email and web security, Steve Crocker, 02:48
- Re: On email and web security, l.wood, 01:26
January 01, 2016
- Re: Tom Taylor, Elwyn Davies, 18:42
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, John Levine, 15:49
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:33
- Re: On email and web security, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:49
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Royer, 14:37
- Re: On email and web security, Doug Royer, 14:07
- RE: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Christian Huitema, 13:52
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Patrik Fältström, 03:49
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Randy Bush, 02:25
- Re: What to improve? BCP-38/SAC-004 anyone?, Patrik Fältström, 02:04