Right.
Arguably, it's rather the second bullet that may be a better candidate. We are
not concerned (and never were) with 'Protocol Conformance' but rather with
interoperability.
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 3:24 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: IETF turns 30
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Happy Birthday!
So, at IETF 1 the following areas of concern were identified:
IETF Areas of Concern -
o Protocol Development and Stabilization, o Protocol Conformance, o An
Implementors Support Organization, o Internet Performance
Measurements, o ISO Conversion.
Only one of them seems clearly out of scope 30 years after.
I imagine you mean the last bullet point? It was only the last 1-2 IETFs where
a new draft was published that (again) suggested a profile to carry IS-IS over
IPv6, so depending on what you mean by "ISO conversion", I'm not so sure
this is out of scope yet :P
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se