Re: Proposed New Note Well

IESG Secretary wrote:

The intent is to make the note well shorter and more readable


Can this goal truly -- not just superficially -- be met if the reader
must "read [BCP 79] carefully," two RFCs totaling 21 pages, in order to
understand the Note Well text?

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proposed New Note Well, (continued) Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter Re: Proposed New Note Well, Stephan Wenger Re: Proposed New Note Well, Jorge Contreras Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter Re: Proposed New Note Well, Stephan Wenger Re: Proposed New Note Well, Harald Alvestrand Re: Proposed New Note Well, Dave Cridland Re: Proposed New Note Well, Mark Nottingham Contributions (Re: Proposed New Note Well), Harald Alvestrand Re: Proposed New Note Well, Ted Lemon Re: Proposed New Note Well, Doug Ewell <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [discuss] Questions, joel jaeggli
Next by Date:	Re: Proposed New Note Well, Brian E Carpenter
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proposed New Note Well, Ted Lemon
Next by Thread:	RE: Hotel situation, Eric Gray
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]