ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed New Note Well

2016-01-04 15:46:11
+1

The only thing that made me wonder is the fuzzy scope of "the discussion" in 
bullet #2; is that discussion specifically covered by that patent, or the whole 
draft, or the whole WG, or...?

Cheers,


On 5 Jan 2016, at 2:41 am, IESG Secretary 
<iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:

The IESG and the IAOC legal team have worked together to propose a new 
version for the note well that is used in various IETF activities. The intent 
is to make the note well shorter and more readable, and point more clearly to 
the full documentation of the various rules.

The current note well is available at 
https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well.html and the proposed new one is below.

The IESG will make a decision about this matter shortly. Please provide 
comments, if any, to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org or to the IESG at 
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org before January 30, 2016.

———

Note Well

This summary does not contain all the details and is only meant to point you 
in the right direction. Exceptions may apply. The IETF's patent policy and 
the definition of an IETF "contribution" are set forth in BCP 79; please read 
it carefully.

The brief summary:

• By participating with the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes and 
policies.
• If you are aware that any contribution to the IETF is covered by patents or 
patent applications that are owned by, controlled by, or would benefit you or 
your sponsor, you must disclose that fact, or not participate in the 
discussion.
• As a participant in any IETF activity you acknowledge that written, audio 
and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public, 
and that recordings of you or your likeness, voice and conduct at the 
recorded event may be displayed, transmitted, copied, used and promoted in 
electronic and physical media accessible throughout the world.
• Personal information that you provide to IETF will be handled in accordance 
with the IETF Privacy Statement set.

For further information, talk to a chair, ask an Area Director, or review the 
following:
​
BCP 9 (on the Internet Standards Process)
​BCP 25 (on the Working Group processes)
​BCP 78 (on copyright in IETF documents)
​BCP 79 (on patents covering IETF documents)
TBD (on IETF Privacy Statement)


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>