Eliot,
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:55 AM, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Jari,
I have no conceptual problem with github being used for draft
development or being integrated in our tools process for state changes,
or archiving of discussions, but I would maintain strong objections to
any approach that would lead to bifurcation of discussion on a topic.
That is- the technology and our relationships with those providing the
service should be conducive to a single integrated conversation on a topic.
To say this another way, using github (or other collaboration tools) is great
for authors or a design team to work together to develop an Internet draft. I
do this myself. I think the dividing line is that drafts should continue to be
submitted via the datatracker as they are now and working groups be using the
datatracker to do their work. I would be very concerned if working groups
started to do their work outside of the datatracker.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail