ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

2016-03-16 15:12:39
in addition “it is the right thing to do”

Scott

On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Scott O. Bradner <sob(_at_)sobco(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

IETF Secretariat
c/o Association Management Solutions, LLC (AMS)
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117
Fremont, California 94538

On Mar 16, 2016, at 1:37 PM, John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:

but, even if we clearly say “we never do that” we still need to have the 
section since 
California law says that we need to have such an ability for people to ask  
(its also the kind of thing that the EU
wants to see)

Why is California law relevant?  The IETF's legal bits are in Virgina
or maybe D.C., not California.

R's,
John