ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

2016-05-21 14:24:00
Hello Melinda,

On 21. 5. 2016, at 20:29, Melinda Shore 
<melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

On 5/21/16 10:14 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
What about announcing venues and cancelling because whatever
circumstances?

Please don't do the slippery slope thing.  Seriously.
This is about a specific circumstance.

Also, understand that you're asking that GLBT people accept
different conditions for participating in an IETF meeting.  I
strongly agree that our top priority is, and has to remain,
getting work done.  But, for better or for worse, a lot of
participants bring their family members, and there are some
basic questions here about equal and unequal treatment, aside
from the potential safety issues.

so do we need a discussion about ability of getting visa for specific nations 
before each meeting to be held in USA?

We as community need to weigh all conditions for the meeting, but I agree with 
Jordi statement - the meeting is for making the work done.

And I'd like to see focus of the community shifted from "hey this country has 
rules for XXXX and this is not acceptable for community YYYY" to making a 
virtual presence more productive. 

Please do not forget for those of us who simply can't afford to travel 
worldwide three times for year.

Michal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>