Hi, Donald.
It is also possible that a code point is being obsoleted by an RFC bis
document but is retained in the registry, in which case you want the
reference for that value to be to the obsolete RFC where it is
specified.
Ooh, yes, that's certainly correct. The current text handles that by
saying "for any registries or registered items that are still in
current use."
Would anyone object, and would this address your concern, Stephen, if
I should change the text like this:
OLD
If information for registered items has been or is being moved to
other documents, then, of course, the registration information should
be changed to point to those other documents. In no case is it
reasonable to leave documentation pointers to the obsoleted document
for any registries or registered items that are still in current use.
NEW
If information for registered items has been or is being moved to
other documents, then the registration information should be changed
to point to those other documents. In most cases, documentation
references should not be left pointing to the obsoleted document
for registries or registered items that are still in current use.
END
Barry